| Component | Translated | Untranslated | Untranslated words | Checks | Suggestions | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| main MIT | 80% | 348 | 6,867 | 43 | 4 | 27 | Browse |
|
|
|||||||
| Project website | https://github.com/andersju/webbkoll | |
|---|---|---|
| Instructions for translators | https://github.com/andersju/webbkoll/blob/master/TRANSLATIONS.md |
|
| Translation license | MIT main | |
| Number of strings | 1,795 | |
| Number of words | 33,985 | |
| Number of characters | 249,235 | |
| Number of languages | 5 | |
| Number of source strings | 359 | |
| Number of source words | 6,797 | |
| Number of source characters | 49,847 | |
| Language | Translated | Strings of total | Untranslated | Untranslated words | Checks | Suggestions | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English | 15 | 4 | Browse | |||||
|
|
||||||||
| French | 6% | 6% | 336 | 6,588 | 5 | 1 | 3 | Browse |
|
|
||||||||
| German | 11 | Browse | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Norwegian Bokmål | 97% | 97% | 9 | 177 | 20 | 6 | Browse | |
|
|
||||||||
| Swedish | 99% | 99% | 3 | 102 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Browse |
|
|
||||||||
@modified: another way of saying it might be, "In our view, 'lawfulness, fairness and transparency' means that, when you visit a website, you should know who is getting your data". So for example, if I visit foobar.com, I (as the visitor) should be informed exactly what's going on - is foobar.com also sending my data to some analytics company?
4 weeks ago@modified - sorry for the late reply. Amelia suggested this rephrasing: "But for this apply, there must already exist a relationship between the web visitor and the web site owner (GDPR Rec. 47), which calls into question the use of third-party service first-party cookies (i.e. if a service from a third party is integrated into your website, and this service uses cookies, those cookies are first-party cookies from the third-party service perspective, but the web visitor may not have visited your website to access the third party service at all; more likely, they visited your website to access your services)." Does that sound better? If so, I'll make the change in the source and update the translation files.
4 weeks ago###Kommentar bitte entfernen###
Albtraum ist die empfohlene Schreibweise https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Albtraum
###Kommentar bitte entfernen###
beispiel.de ist zwar eine legitime Beispiel-Domain, enthält aber Ressourcen aus Drittquellen (namentlich Google). Diese Tatsache sollte gegen die Erwähnung sprechen, weil dieses Projekt versucht, den Datenschutz zu fördern.
@andersju No problem at all. Sorry, the explanation of "third-party service first-party cookies" is confusing me more than it is clarifying to me. At first I thought this meant cookies served for third parties but via the website (domain) itself, but now it sounds more like regular third-party cookies to me. If the latter was correct, I would completely remove all the "first-party" stuff, as I don't see what it is trying to accomplish/explain. Also, reading Rec. 47 carefully, the "there must already exist a relationship" part is incorrect. It just says to consider the relationship and, as an example, describes a case where there is a relationship.
To be honest, I would remove this sentence completely. If anything, I could imagine a sentence about the second part of the legitimate interest clause – that you also have to consider the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the visitor, and whether the processing is necessary to achieve what the interests aim at.
4 weeks ago